St Anslem

st anslem In the following I intend to prove that the ontological argument is in and of itself, insufficient in proving that God exists. in that location are a few problems with the argument that I allow be discussing in detail in an attempt to elaborate exactly why The Ontological Argument is unsatisfactory. The Definition of greater St. Anselm of Canterbury defined God as that-than-which-a-greater-cannot-be-thought (Bailey, 2002). The problem with this definition is that the endpoint greater is surely up for interpretation.

The term greater requires a comparison between itself and one or more things, which could post a problem for Anselms argument; however prof Thorp states that the only difference between these two things is that one exists in the mind, while the other exists in the mind and in mankind. If we understand that a God that exists in the mind and in reality is greater than one that merely exists in the mind thence we must understand that ...If you want to get a panoptic essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper