The mind and body has been a major offspring debated by philosophers over the past centuries. Philosophers have fervently tried to get out the truth behind the distinction between the mind and the body. precisely even with the extensive amount of arguing and thinking tramp into this problem, it is still seemingly debatable. We as humans have a difficult time comprehending such an abstract idea as the mind, therefore making it even more difficult to frame up this view in perspective. Two philosophers who argue over this topic are Rene Descartes and Benedictus de Spinoza. Descartes was one of the few early thinkers to dissect and respect the mind/body problem with his tune for dualism. In limit to Descartes was Benedictus de Spinoza who provides a counter-example to Descartes dualism, namely what is known as the epitome looking at theory. By analyzing the views of both philosophers we can see which argument seems more plausible. Descartes first proposes his argument for dualism in his work Meditations, publish in 1641. Spinoza with an opposing view replies with his double aspect theory, which headlands dualism.
Descartes starts out his argument for dualism with his method of doubt where he must raze everything in [his] life, down to the very bottom, so as to being again from the first foundations (232).
Basically, he must question everything in existence including himself and everything around him to find out whether or not there is substantial evidence to claim that anything really exists. From this he tries to figure out what is certain and indubitable (235), or what is essential for his existence. This is where dualism comes into play. There are basically two categories in which Descartes separates the certain from the uncertain and the indubitable from the dubitable. The first are corporeal attributes, or extensions, such as...
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment