History And Philosophy Of Psychology Essay

History and Philosophy of PsychologyAbstractThis strive answers the following two machination object question : critic all toldy examine the state that semisynthetic positivity and kind constructionism atomic number 18 akin(predicate) in both(prenominal) serious respects . If they ar similar , what atomic number 18 the consequences of this for psycho lucid cognition s hereafter as a scientific discipline Conclusions ar skeletal base on look into d nonpargonilHistory and Philosophy of PsychologyCritically examine the claim that analytical incontrovertibility and fond constructionism are similar in virtually all-important(prenominal) respectsLogical advantageousness explanationLogical licit incontrovertibleness holds that philosophical administration should purport to the selfsame(prenominal) sort of HYPERLINK http / cyclopaedia .laborlawtalk .com /Rigor robustness as intuition and that it should provide austere criteria for judging sentences sure , fictive and intendless ( dictionary .Labourtalk .com 2005Logical positivism made practice of emblematical licit system , endorsed the verifiability principle as a criterion of meaning and bang-up importance to the analysis of row of meaning . Philosophers in this season (1920 - 1936 ) included Schlick , Reichenbach and Carnap . Logical positivism was born from positivism , and preceded logical empiricism post positivism and post modernism hearty constructionism definitionSocial constructionism is defined as the forecast that the phenomena of the social and pagan world and their meanings are created in human social fundamental interaction . Taken still , social constructionism send packing be utilise to social research itself . The burn down often , though non solely , draws on idealist philosophical orientations (Seale , C 2004 ) The idealist seeks a reassure , consoling , kinsperson universe (Stove , 1991SimilaritiesThe received great deal is that logical positivism and social constructionism are anti-thetical . However , beca design they are similar in some important regards , this received view is not an accurate one - the following three similarities can be cadaverous mingled with the two disciplines Firstly , logical positivism exponents Schlick and Carnap disconnect what is cognize and experienced from scientific cognition . The inwardness of extra-mental reality is in their eyes not viable .

as well , social constructionism draws a distinction amongst what is known and what is experiencedSecondly , logical positivism lengthens the doctrine of conventionalism from the ordinarily accepted principles of geometry to logic , maths and some theoretical propositions . Social constructionism , albeit unwittingly , does the same to all propositions of scienceThirdly , Wittgenstein s `meaning as use thesis is drawn upon in both disciplines - in logical positivism , it is apply with Schlick s after defense of the verifiability principle and operationism , and in social constructionism it is invoked to bear turn up claims that all meanings of scientific ground are derived from the context of its usageIf they are similar , what are the consequences of this for psychology s future as a scientific disciplineThe Concise Oxford Dictionary (Fowler and Fowler , 1976 ) gives us the following definition of the term psychology : It is the science of the nature , functions and phenomena of the human replete(predicate) or mind and the treatise on , or the system of this . Because it is base on a science psychology is therefore a scientific discipline . By nature , a scientific discipline develops in stages and is influenced by the beliefs and thoughts of it s exponents at any given...If you penury to get a sound essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper