Educating the Public about the Other Genders

Issues about sex activity variation and segregation bemuse been draw all the institutions, particularly schools and the workplace, over time (Blackwell, 2003 Albelda, 1986 Anker, 1998 Peace, 2003 Lester, 2008). At first, these issues were merely betwixt manpower and women.Now, there argon another(prenominal) genders claiming for equality with the two socially accepted genders. Unequal opportunities, violence, and social injustices against sapphic, gay, bi versed, and transgender (LGBT) are still subjects of other genders struggle nowadays (Sloan & Gustavsson, 1998).In addition, a number of arguments about lesbian and gay parenting, same-sex marriage and other familial rights tend to intensify other genders claim for equality, whereas in lesbian and gay parenting, the society is questioning their capability of serving as a role model of children at piazza (Hicks, 2008 Clarke, 2001 Hicks & McDermott, 1999 Nicol & Smith, 2008 Ghoshal, 2009).Gender critics and gender sensitive organizations are lobbying that if only the public has been educated regarding the man and concerns of LGBT, then inequality and violence against these communitys go forth be lessened and will be eradicated, if possible.The Other GendersInitially, there were two socially accepted genders men and women. Now lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender are claiming acceptance from the society. Many psychological, biological and medical exam studies are conducted to explain and analyze the other manifestations of sexuality among the two primordial genders (men and women), yet the to the highest degree widely accepted analysis is that of Robert J. Stoller which argued that,A persons physical sexual attributes, mental attitudes and objects of desire could vary independently of oneness another so that a man with predominantly male characteristics and alike masculine in his erotic life may still be inverted in respect to his object, loving only men kind of of women (cited in Glover, 20 02).Such statement explains the psychological cases of LGBT even if they possess the physical sexual attributes these populations tend to think and act the other way contradictory of what is judge of them being a man or a woman. School class and Gender StudiesThe growing numbers of LGBT at young age (10 eld old and below) alarmed many institutions particularly those concern in procreation and health care. Gender critics urge the inclusion of a gender-sensitive curriculum in all education institutions since near of the national school curricula manifests gender inequalities which cover a hegemonic male ascendancy within a State and to a greater extent or less the world (Arnot, 2002 Marshall & Arnot, 2008 Peace, 2003).Previously, the courses being offered in all colleges and universities manifested gender inequality for instance, there were separate courses for women and for men. Women are now entitled to take mens courses and vice versa. Moreover, the titles Baccalaureate and Masters Degree connote the dominance of men in earlier education dust.Also significant in the system of education is the prohibition of women to become school administrator not until the exit of 1972 Title IX of the Education Amendments (Meritz, 2006). It has been identified that the church is responsible for the paternal education and to the flight of women and LGBT for acceptance and equality (Pray, 1847). At present, LGBT are desire their place in education curriculum to avoid gender orientation course being provided only for men and women.Homophobia in School and Nursing EnvironmentThere have been claims that education institutions are the best and safe place for LGBT youth, yet most studies conducted found that schools are usually a place of harassment where these populations are often victimized by peers and even by their teachers (Sloan, 1998).Many researches stated that most teachers and education professionals are not ready to address and affirm the call for of LGBT people thus, their heterosexual students are likely to show negative attitudes toward the LGBT population (Macgillivray & Jennings, 2008 Blackburn & Donelson 2004 Szalacha, 2004 Robinson & Ferfolja, 2001 Kozik-Rosabal & Macgillivray, 2000 Roffman, 2000 Casper & Schults, 1999 Petrovic, 1998 Maney & Cain, 1997).Analyzing the trend, studies also discovered that, compared to heterosexual women, heterosexual men are more likely to be prejudiced against LGBT (Herek, 1988 Ratcliff, Lassiter, Markman & Snyder, 2006 Bem, 1993).