Essay --

theology is the single most controversial and mind-boggling train of thought currently known to compassionate-kind, and no particular individual more so exemplifies this action (or better summarizes my own personal beliefs) than Niccol Machiavelli. Few writers in the whole of the human history have inspired the kind of personal hatred that Machiavelli has in the last 500 years, and few works have been as vilified, (or as popular) as The Prince. Machiavelli has been slandered and portrayed as a defender of tyrannical government, an sceptical promoter of im theology, and a manipulator whose interests were all self-serving. Today, the Oxford dictionary hush characterizes Machiavellian as of, like, or characterized by the political principles and methods of expediency, craftiness, and duplicity set forrad in Machiavellis book, The Prince crafty, deceitful, and so on. Folk legend holds that Old Nick, a assimilate term for the Devil, is derived from Machiavellis first name, Niccol. With that context kept in mind, isnt morality founded on a specific set of core ideas? Isnt it ever so defined by the acknowledgement of a central moral loyalty dominating all the others? From individualism to families, from tribalism to racism, from nationalism to religious fundamentalism or the loyalty to a totalitarian party what we see is the drawing of different circles pertain on a basic, paramount moral norm. And Machiavelli is unquestionably not stray in positing the interest of the nation as the foundation of his moral thinking. At the beginning of the 21st century we ar still living in spite of appearance that same ideal nationalist realism. What could be more Machiavellian than the construction My nation right or wrong, which seems to be a still rattling popul... ...day? How can we maintain that, in an era when, from migrations to terrorism to the Tsunami to Chernobyl to aviary flu to AIDS, we atomic number 18 obliged to cope with challenges that are global , group ethics (be it tribal, religious or nationalistic) matches our reality, our needs, our stage of human development? We are definitely not on the eve of a global state, and yet we are no longer able to confine our economic, political, cultural but also moral scope within the limits of the borders of our national republic.There is no slack solution to our moral quandrums (another much discussed idea in the Discourses. Machiavellis daring, his cognisance of unadorned reality, his honesty and anti-hypocrisy, his republican commitment can help us, if we are able to grasp the essence of his politics and his ethics, also in this very complex and problematic stage of human development.