NGN Migration

on that point is an pressing need that telecommunication functions that ar converged and qualitative be offered as this will pave way for the next Generation Networks focusing on reducing the living digital divide. NGN migration involves the attend to of changing the dormant cabinets to being active. This requires actually accurate in systema skeletaleation on the local loop connectivity enabling the existing pairs to be rapidly copied from the existing frame to a sore one and without erring. (Michael, 2001)Once the migration is completed without some(prenominal) renovation interruption any information concerning the quality of the pairs is very evidential in supplying the high-pitched-bandwidth operate. Most carriers and service providers argon looking for an offensive improvement of their go and their migration to the New Generation Services Network.There is an overwhelming competition which is continually eroding the profitability of most of the service provider s absolute majority of whom are transiting to IP.The NGN service providers consequently need to a greater extent inventive go on theatrical role infrastructures that will improve the current services delivery. They should as well provide a framework for solutions in the intelligence of the greater net income. (Lee, Deborah, Kevin, and Sally, 2000)The carriers will not sole(prenominal) have a short term relief through flexibleness and incorporation besides alike their stupefy in seizing opposite new market opportunities will be expanded. The solutions which are part and split up of the Cisco IP NGN objectives encompass a wider transformation of both the inherent businesses and the service providers. The IP NGN sanctions the service providers to meet all the customers needs more(prenominal) efficiently while providing a basis for delivering profit sustaining applications.Cisco IP NGM has created an intelligent infrastructure that opens opportunities for service provider s so that they seat offer more advanced and personalized media services over any other form of connection. Cisco strongly supports the NGN transition in relation to its conceptual proviso and the meshing design. It alike serves as a business partner living the service providers on the NGN migration. Cisco on the other hand assists the service providers in transforming their businesses and their networks.The transformation offers new value added services that help them plus their profitability and achieve greater efficiency. The IP NGM usher outnot be bought by the service providers since it evolves constantly adapting to its customers demands and opportunities in the new technology. However it is possible to still give speculations about the transformation.The NGM encompasses the service providers current and future services realizing the fact that the largest part of the growth will be in information and video services. Voice services will initially be significant in the se rvice portfolio giving way to richer media services inclusive of video, voice and data. (Larry & Bruce, 2000)The shift towards NGN entails the service providers network as a whole since it not only concerns itself with bandwidth in network access but in addition in the delivery of an excellence bandwidth in the entire network. IP NGM is more about making significant changes to an individual network thus creating a single network for service deliveries.A regulators introductionwide symposium held in February 2007 laid down guidelines for NGNs migration with a goal of promoting frameworks that promote innovation, and a sensibly priced access to NGN.This took place in a three day run into in Dubai during which guidelines for telecommunications migration were laid down. The regulators designed a roadmap that would encourage frameworks that are regulate .The International Engineering Consortium experts gave an NGN definition as the blend in the midst of the public scourgeed teleph one network (PSTN) and the public switched data network (PSDN) as it also creates a multi service single network.An explanation was given that the switch infrastructures proprietary owned, the architecture for NGNs pushes for a central office functions to the network edge. The results are a network infrastructure that is well distributed leveraging open and new technologies therefore reducing the market entry cost and change magnitude tractability as well as accommodate the packet-switched data and the circuit-switched data. (Ericsson, 2001)Other scholars besides defined it as the future networks stimulated by the need to embark data and multimedia services through the same network having very flexible deployment and the capability to change motley models in the economy for the beaver results. The telecommunications regulatory department globally that is in charge of the standardization also defined NGN as a network that is packet ground with the probable to provide various telecommunication services and simultaneously making give of the multiple broadband.Practically speaking the NGN involves architectural changes which include the core network through the PSTN design and the cable and wire access.NGN encompasses transport networks as a core network with each built for a totally diametric service to become a single transport network which is oftenly based on either internet protocol (IP) or Ethernet.There is a specific definition between the network services running on the transports top and the connectivity ratio of the network. This indicates that when a new service is to be enabled by a provider this could be done by first nowadays defining the service layer without the consideration of the transport layer. Here the services are independent of any details pertaining transport thus increasing the applications that are independent of the network access through delayering of the application and the networks.The global symposium for the regulators w as initiated in the grade 2000with participants from all over the world as this year they centered on the NGNs migration. It focused on the roadmap to next generations networks and how they could achieve success at the same time promoting investment. The meeting also fully did an examination on the regulatory issues that are very urgent such as the NGNs interconnection, competition, universal access, consumer protection, investment and the global interconnection of the internet. harmonise to the regulators secretary general the best practices were to be adopted offering a possible way of providing benefits to both the consumers and the service providers through reduced costs. They would also offer new and innovative services to the consumers.The guidelines also called upon the regulators to adopt regimes that can be subjected to regular checkups ensuring that competition barriers are eliminated. They were to ensure that both the users and the providers can easily migrate to other n etworks in the future when all the involve market conditions are met. (Bennett, 2001)The regulators were ready to tailor the adopted practices in the world market as they were also urged in adopting flexible interconnection models that would award a very smooth transition to the NGNs.They were also urged to maintain a playing field that is leveled thus protecting the interests of the consumers.The participants made an agreement that various steps were to be taken that the market did not suffer any form of competition distortion especially in the issue of convergence. There was also a risk that the providers of the NGN and the operators also were in a position to regulate the competition at the service level to their own advantage. The regulators were also cautioned to be on the look out monitoring any incidents requiring a regulatory response (Erick, 2001)The ITU director also gave an explanation that NGN was placed in-between thee internet and the telecom worlds thus bringing ou t a admixture of issues to be handled by the regulators themselves. They were also encouraged to clearly define policies that would bring home the bacon the IP networks and the legacy to co-exist offering a voice together. There should be a consideration put in place while making the obligations applicable to the providers and the operators of the telephony services not considering the service delivery to the consumers (Anders 2000)The issues pertaining the make of the NGNs migration are to be addressed with urgency for the formation of a high level co-coordinating committee consisting of the major key players in the industry. These key spate are to all the issues relevant so that there is a there is a systematic and smooth transition from the existing networks to the NGNs.Various issues are to be handled by the committee formed so that they can create knowingness for the NGNs building programme.They are also expected to put up a timetable for the NGN migration world wide.Refere ncesAnders A. (2000) Capacital study of statistical multiplexing for IP telephony. Technical Report T200003, SICS. P 78-105Bennett, J. (2001) Voice over packet reliability issues for next generation net-Works. In IEEE International Conference on Communications, volume 1,ICC, June 2001. P 142145.Eirik, H. (2001) Planning for migration to a next generation network. Masters thesis, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland, September 2001 p 89-99Ericsson, O. (2001) The migration story Different highways to a multi-service net-Work. White Paper, October 2001. p 85Larry L. & Bruce S. (2000) calculating machine Networks, a Systems Approach. Morgan Kaufmann, second edition. P 45-66Lee B., Deborah E., Kevin, F., and Sally F. (2000) Advances in network simulation. IEEE Computer, 33(5), 78-84Michael, D. (2001) Evolving the next generation network. Technical ReportPR 109 NPD 01, Eircom, March 2001.p 56-89