The Big Society: A Realistic Objective or a Political Myth?

Chapter 1 IntroductionSocio-political back undercoatThe company mingled with obliging parliamentary procedure and the enounce reflects the changing nature of the universe mysterious interaction and poses questions about the bureau of government in advanced capitalist societies. The constantly changing kinetics of the public-private coexistence is a direct response to the puzzle outes of globalization and modernization, which tack up placed the evince in an entirely different realm, and have challenged its parameters as a political entity.On the international level, what Samuel Huntington called the third wave of democratization (1991) has seen the globalization of public politics, and according to some, the undermined capacity of the resign (Cerny, 1990 Scholte, 2006 Rosenau 1990). The third wave of democratization in the world has also been marked by the tramp of the global well-mannered decree and the increasing power of non-governmental organizations and assoc iations (Bull, 1977).On the domestic level, a kindred process fuel be traced. Throughout the last several decades, the traditionalistic political ubiquity of the state has been challenged, with the rise of complaisant night club and associational democracy (Baccaro, 2002). The state no longer exists in its exhausted and nail confinement as a provider of public services. Its functions, theorists like Baccaro argue, have been divulged to the topical anaesthetic communities and voluntary associations, which have become the new pillar non only of public opinion, but also for public advocacy in legislature. courtly society challenges the modern state to some extent, but its functions do not aim to undermine its capabilities. As this dissertation will argue, they try on to reinforce them.1.2 Research aimsThis dissertation will examine the feasibility and sustainability of the full-size beau monde Project as a determine of political governance. In order to do this, the author will focus on the connection between the private and the public in the contemporary state, and will esteem the resuscitating power of civil society in the public sector. It will illustrate the theoretical connection between the two through the critical abridgment of a rather contemporary juxtaposition between civil society and the state, proposed by the nonprogressive Party in 2010. Specific aspects will go along the shift of state powers from the public to the private realm.1.3 Historical trends before the expectant SocietyAlthough the whopping Society was represented as a strategy by the traditionalist Party, its ideological tenets can be found in anterior observations, related to the rise of an independent civil state and alliance participation.Attempts to control civil society and the state in the same political par have started at the turn of the last century, with a deep afterthought of the master(prenominal) characteristics of advanced capitalist societies and t he role of the state. A leading red ink theorist, Antonio Gramsci proposes a classic division between the state and non-state elements of governance in his Selections from the Prison noebooks (1971). He views civil society as an organic entity, which exists beyond the realm of the government. The controversy in his theoretical sample of governance comes from the magnified view that the civil society can exist as a self-regulatory body in a stateless world. A to a greater extent muffle view on the connection between civil society and the state is proposed by sociologist Max weber. In his Politics of the Civil Society Weber discusses the estimation of public citizenship and its role in mass democracy. He discusses civil society not as an alternative, but as a cultivating force, undeniable for the existence of the modern state (Weber, 2004). The Weberian approach to understanding civil society suggests that the connection between the public and private is not ineluctably exclus ionary, as suggested by the Marxists. In his 1962 Capitalism and semipolitical Freedom, economist Milton Friedman discusses economic neo-liberalism as an consequential prerequisite for political freedom of the citizens. He emphasizes the central role of the government as a provider of legislature, which would enforce property rights and civil institutions. Friedmans economic philosophy of government intervention suggests a model of public-private cook of governance. In an extensive study on favorable movements called beyond Left and Right, Anthony Giddens goes even further and suggests that tender movements are stronger advocates for change than political parties are (Giddens, 1994). Last but not least, in his Bowling solo Americas Declining cordial Capital (1995) Robert Putnam uses the decline of voluntary associations and civil engagement to explain the social decay of the American community. As symptoms of social apathy, he points out the political disengagement of the Am erican public and its ontogenesis distrust to the government (Putnam, 1995). The ideological tenet of the large-scale Society can also be related to what Lucio Baccaro calls associational democracy (2002). He describes associational democracy as the inter office between civil society and the state. Baccaros vision of decentralisation and empowerment of the topical anesthetic communities can be use to fit the heavy(a) Society into a wider theoretical realm. Baccaro offers a model of public-private governance, which reveals elements of societal conservatism puke the sizable Societys main goal the shift of regulatory powers from the government bureaucrats into the reach of the people.It is not voiceless to notice a historical trend on the changing divisions between civil society and the state. Last several decades have witnessed a major shift towards empowerment of the private sector, and sell of powers and regulatory functions in the hands civil society organizations. Th is trend does not necessarily mean barely that the state as a provider of services and individual well-being is in decline. On the contrary, this historic tendency suggests that civil society is a pillar, not a threat to the state and can act as a channel for enlighten in the public sector. The next section will examine its contemporary manifestations as a policy, proposed by David Cameron and the Conservative Party in 2010.1.4. What is the great SocietyIn July 2010 in Liverpool, after the general elections, David Cameron re-launched the better-looking Society Programme, which was to become part of the political platform of the new unification government. The programme had five main tenets localism and more power for the communities volunteerism transfer of power from central to local government support of cooperatives, charities, and social enterprises hydrofoil of government legislation (Cameron, 2010). Under the Big Society programme, initiatives such as the Big Society B ank and the National Citizen Service (NCS) were established.The stem privy the Big Society is to attribute more responsibilities to the citizens as key participants in the policy-making process. According to David Cameron, its main purpose was to propose a ground up approach of governance, where power and ideas will derive from the people (Cameron, 2010). The Conservative Party proposed the Big Society Project as the engine of public sector reform.The government indicated that the Big Society would empower local communities in their attempts to solve problems in their own neighborhood, and to voice their opinions.1.4.1 IdeologyThe ideology hindquarters the Big Society is an unconventional type of conservatism. It views successful governance as a hybrid between the private and the public sectors, and citizens initiative as a prerequisite for associational democracy. The idea behind the Big Society is very often overturned with classic Marxism, which offers an extreme and rather u topian view of civic associations as a necessary replacement of the state. The rise of a big society however, does not imply the demise of the state. The Big Society can be interpreted as a politically sensible response to the economic recession, poverty, and social breakdown. It has lead to Camerons recognition of the role of the public sector and volunteerism as antidotes of a disintegrating society (Bochel & Defty, 2010 Evans, 2011 Smith, 2010). The ideas of the Big Society diverge from the stance of some of David Camerons predecessors such as Margaret Thatcher, because it recognizes the role of non-state associations as advocates for political change and providers for the citizens. At the same time, it does not use the societal factor as an umbrella for a littler government (Norman, 2011 Smith, 2010). Therefore, the ideology behind the Big Society can be described as societal conservatism. Societal should not be confused with social (or socialist), because the Big Society cip her does not exclude privatization inside the welfare sector and public sector cuts.1.4.2 ResponsesThe Big Society project has provoked mixed responses. Its supporters claim that the idea to unite the public and the private sector as providers for the citizens is revolutionary and democratically advanced. Liberals tend to view this idea as innovative, because it emphasizes the role of the citizens in shaping modern day policy.The main criticisms of the Big Society are that is has been used to justify the radical figure cuts in the public and social sectors, and is too utopian to be employ in practice. A popular criticism points to the lack of citizens fillip and suppress skills, which are prerequisites for a fulfilling civic participation (Grint & Holt, 2011 Hasan, 2010).1.4.3 Local empowerment and decentralization sectionalism and decentralization have been key tenets on the Big society agenda. Some of the proposals, designed to empower local authorities and citizens include in troducing nowadays elected mayors and police commissioners devolving the financial powers of local government increasing transparency and letting local citizens choose the organisational structure of their local council (Inside Government, 2011).The ideology behind local empowerment and decentralization is akin to the neo-liberal political thought. The transformation of local empowerment into an actual policy came to life in March 2011, when the localism Bill was passed by the House of Commons despite controversies over social housing (Hodge, 2011). Some of the prescriptions of the Localism Bill have already been put into practice. Ministers have started giving councils greater financial freedom, by devolving ?7 trillion more of government funding. They have removed burdens and bureaucratic controls so that they local governments can prioritize budgets to support public services in ways, which get the priorities of local people and communities (Communities & Local Government, 201 1).This is one way to enhance reform in the public sector, as it will give more incentive for local governments to improve their services, and they will be transformed from recipients of policy, into actual initiators of one.1.4.4 Volunteerism other important tenet of the Big Society Project is the idea of volunteerism and civic associations. The new government has encouraged voluntary organizations and social enterprises, as another(prenominal) way to reform the public sector. Two of the key programmes, related to Big Society volunteerism are the National Citizens Service (NCS) and Community Organizers. These two programmes lay thousands of volunteers of all age groups and different social backgrounds nationwide, and their participation in community projects in 2011 and 2012 (Cabinet Office, 2011).The ideology behind volunterrism relates to associational democracy, which holds that democratization does not necessarily come from the state, but also from the citizenry, with its accu mulated incentives and skills. As far as policy is concerned, both NCS and Community Organizers already exist as programmes. Whether faculty has been achieved will be discussed in detail in the following chapters.In general, the Big Society is an opportunity for citizens to participate in the actual process of policy-making and to provide first-hand feedback to those responsible for legislation. The most important component of the Big Society is the financial autonomy of the local councils, because it will play important part in the allocation of budgets. Local councils know the needs of their residents get out than the national government (Smith, 2010 Norman, 2011). Their financial plans will be much more hardheaded and sustainable, targeting the public sectors policies, which have the biggest demand and have been starved for resources in the past. Financial decentralization can bring not only bettor quality of public sector services, but also more realistic response to the act ual needs of the local residents.1.5 SummaryThis chapter has traced the historical and policy features of the idea of the Big Society, and has examined some of its basic tenets. The remaining chapters will examine in detail the feasibility of the Big Society as a form of political governance, which can make local communities more involved in the policy-making process.Bibliography Baccaro, L. (2002) Civil Society Meets the State A Model of associational Democracy. International Labour Office Working Paper No. DP/138/2002. usable at SSRN http//ssrn.com/abstract=334860 or doi10.2139/ssrn.334860Retrieved 05.03.2012Bochel, H. & Defty, A. (2010) true(p) as HouseConservative Social Policy, Public Opinion and Parliament, The Political Quarterly, Vol 81, No 1, January-MarchBull, H. (1977). The Anarchical Society A Study of Order in military personnel Politics. Basingstoke Palgrave MacmillianCabinet Office (2010) Government Launches Big Society Programme, 18 May, Available at http//www.cabi netoffice.gov.uk/news/government-launches-big-society-programmeRetrieved 05.03.2012___________ (2010) Government Puts Big Society at the Heart of Public Sector Reform, 18 MayAvailable at http//www.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/news/big-society-heart-public-sector-reformRetrieved 05.03.2012___________ (2010) Building the Big Society, Available at http//www.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/sites/default/files/resources/building-big-society.pdfRetrieved 05.03.2012Cameron, D. (2010) Big Society Speech, Monday, 19 JulyAvailable at http//www.number10.gov.uk/news/speeches-and-transcripts/2010/07/big-society-speech-53572Retrieved 05.03.2012Cerny, P.G. (1990). The ever-changing Architecture of Politics Structure, Agency and the succeeding(a) of the State, capital of the United KingdomCommunities and Local Government (2011) The Localism Bill marks a turn point, 7 June, Available at http//www.communities.gov.uk/news/corporate/1917316Retrieved 05.03.2012Della Porta, D. & Diani, M. (2006). Social Movements An In troduction. Blackwell Publishing Ltd, UK. p. 93-113Evans, K. (2011) Big Society in the UK A Policy critical review, Vol 25, Issue 2, pp. 164-171, MarchFriedman, M. (1962) The Relation between Economic Freedom and Political Freedom, Capitalism and Freedom. University of Chicago Press, pp. 7-17Available at http//www.mtholyoke.edu/acad/intrel/ipe/friedman.htmRetrieved 05.03.2012Giddens, A. (1994) Beyond Left and Right. The Future of Radical Politics, Stanford University PressGramsci, A. (1971) Selections from the Prison Notebooks, Lawrence and WishartGrint, K. & Holt, C. (2011) Leading Questions If Total Place, Big Society and local leadership are the answers Whats the question?, Leadership, 7 (I) 85-98Hasan, M. (2010) The Sham of Camerons Big Society, New Statesman, 22 NovemberHodge, K. (2011) Localism bill passed, advice for the elderly and regeneration cash, Housing Network Blog, Guardian, 19 MayAvailable at http//www.guardian.co.uk/housing-network/2011/may/19/localism-bill-advice -elderly-regeneration-cashRetrieved 05.03.2012Huntington, S. P. (1991) Democracys Third Wave. The Journal of Democracy, 2(2)Inside Government (2011) Big Society 2011 Empowering Communities, promote Social Action and Opening Up Public Services, 31 MarchAvailable at http//www.insidegovernment.co.uk/economic_dev/big-society-2011/Retrieved 05.03.2012Marquand, D. (2004) The Decline of the Public Hollowing Out Citizenship, code Press, CambridgeNorman, J. (2011) The Anatomy of the New Politics Buckingham University of Buckingham PressPutnam, R. (1995). Bowling Alone. Americas Declining Social Capital Journal of Democracy 6, 65-78Available at http//canonsociaalwerk.be/1995_Putnam/1995,%20Putnam,%20bowling%20alone.pdfRosenau, J.N. (1990) agitation in World Politics A Theory and Continuity, LondonScholte, J.A.(2006). globalisation a Critical Introduction. Palgrave Macmilian, UK. p. 13-123Smith, M. (2010) From Big Government to Big Society Changing the StateSociety Balance, Parliamentary A ffairs, Vol. 63, Issue 4, pp. 818-833Weber, M. (2004) Politics of the Civil Society, Cambridge Cambridge University Press