'Mr Alex\r'

'Human science fragments everything In order to understand It, kills everything In order to get word It. ” (Leo Tolstoy, War and Peace)l There has always existed the question whether gay sciences ar considered real sciences and if do they really detect the established guidelines of science. The argument is t wear the natural sciences take a different approach to results and grow a firm dependence on the observer. This is due to the fact, that in some cases human sciences have to take into account concepts, which atomic number 18 hard to measure like peppiness or love.Likewise, the background knowledge and empathy of the observer affect the results of the try. When talking about human sciences is important to highlight that they dont march a theory, as there is no nose candy% certainty in any of the experiments. They only minimal brain dysfunction information to the understanding of a topic or concept. To further develop my argument that state of matters that Human sciences are scientific, the Boob Doll Experiment will be analyses to develop this claim. The Boob Doll Experiment was presented by Albert Bandeau to help prove his belief hat all human behavior was learned with copying and imitating, rather than through genetic factors.This experiment is still controversial to this day, as many debaters state that todays globalize society that promotes violence. Therefore children are much pr sensation to violent behavior than in former(a) generations. Dry. Albert Bandeau used children on his experiment, as they have little knowledge on rules of society and less prone on behaving as the society calculate is right. He had four hypotheses; the first one was that children witnessing self-assertive behavior by adults loud replicate their actions however if adults were not nearby.The second one states that children who have spy non- high-pressure behavior are less likely to be violent. Even less than the control group, who have not even seen an a dult. (Role Model) The third one proposes that children are much susceptible to copy the actions of an adult of the same-sex. The last one suggested that male children would be more aggressive than the opposite sex. Ii The Experiment had a simple and intelligibly stated Dependent Variable and Independent Variable. withal it had a Control Group used as comparison with the other woo groups, the one with aggressive and peaceful adults.Moreover the experiment can be recurrent to add up and compare the information; this is a scientific quality that complies with the scientific theory. Another big aspect to take into account Is that each of the subjects was tried Individually to avoid other Individuals affecting the reactions of the subject. ailment On the other hand, the experiment had some distinctly flaws. For example It generalizes the results as Just a few children were part of the experiment, so the sample is very sign on and specific.\r\n'